Just a quickie, but I’ve late been getting lots of e-mails from MC-Nudes going on about their busty nude girls’ 3D porn galleries. Here are a few erotic examples to illustrate their take on tits into the third dimension…
…so, curious as I was, I found an old cardboard pair of 3D glasses (you know, the red / cyan anaglyph type) and took me a gander, wondering if big tits in 3D might well be the wave of the future? And, while I’m still not convinced, I thought I should throw the concept out to you, dear readers, to see what you think. Granted, the first two sexy nude girls in the 3D photos above, Peach & Jenny, both have but small DD-cup breasts (hmm, would that make this 3DD or even 3DDD for Double-D Dimensions instead?) and our second pair of naked nymphs, Domino & Micha, have only E-cup tits between them, so I can’t help but wonder if the clever folk at MC-Nudes had used girls with bigger boobs in 3D for more of a tits in your face full-on effect, such as the even more three-dimensional G-cup globes of glamor goddess Princessa (shown here in good, old-fashioned 2D photo form), I might’ve been a bit more keen?
it’s an interesting effect alright, but yeah…I can’t help but think bigger boobs would have made for a better experience ;p
In looking at a few of these old style 3D photos, I have to comment with my personal opinion of how 3D photos and movies alike are not being filmed correctly. As recently as Avatar, the film makers are spoiling the 3D effect by having objects out of focus on the screen. For example, the first picture of this post has a beautiful woman looking in a mirror (providing the deepest perspective of the whole set) and her body is blurry, while her reflection is clear (when wearing the glasses). For a true 3D experience the person viewing should be able to look at any area of a photo or movie scene and see that area in perfect focus. The fact that all 3D technology (new and old) relies on having two images on screen, the blur effect will come naturally as you move your focus to different “depths” of the image.
question: “Big Tits in 3D – The Way of the Future?”
answer: “No.”
A few years ago, I came across several 3-D color images of Virginia Bell outdoors, probably on a Calif. hillside. They were in pairs, one for each eye.
There’s one way of arranging them, the image for the left eye on the left; I find that miserably difficult to view without lenses.
The other alternative is to swap sides, and view them cross-eyed; cross your eyes until the center of three images merges, and you should see 3-D.
I hope to find those V. Bell pairs, eventually. They seem to be rare.
Virginia Bell had a nice figure, nice, friendly good-looking face, and a yummy set of big boobs. Wikipedia has an entry (“actress”), as does
Boobpedia.
Score attempted it with a Christy Marks DVD, a while back, and it was lame (which is hard to do with Christy or Score, for that matter).
I’m not gonna be jackin’ with freaking glasses on my head, 2D is just fine, especially with all the stunning models that i can barely keep up with, as it is.
I wasn’t sure where else to post this, so I have dug back to this 3-D post hoping you will see it and be able to follow up on it. The pictures I want you to look into are called Stereograms. Since you won’t alow links on your comments I will simply ask you to search for “stereoscopic breast” and hopefully you will find the beautiful dark haired woman removing her sexy white bra as an example of what I am talking about.
These are pairs of pictures that look identical, but are taken from slightly different perspectives and when you cross your eyes at the photo to bring them together (like the opposite of those magic eye pictures) the resulting image is a perfect 3 dimentinal picuture of (hopefully) a beautiful large breasted woman!
I hope you like the idea and can find more than I did to blog about!
Mike.