Normal-Sized Boobs or Truly Massive Tits?

I know I’ve blogged the lovely 32L Rachel Andana quite recently but, just the other day, I received the following simply stunning behind-the-scenes topless photo of her via e-mail which really got me to thinking…

Rachel Aldana 32L - L-cup Slim and Stacked Girl with Massive Breasts Sideways View Topless Tits from RachelAldana.com

…yes, I was thinking about her tits (or course) but, more specifically, my personal standards of what constitutes normal breast size in women. While MyBoobSite adheres to EN 13402 where cup-size measures are concerned and professes an F-cup and up motto for mammary measurements for the big boob blog’s sake, I found myself pondering this lovely side-on photo of L-cup Rachel Aldana topless and genuinely felt in my heart of hearts that I was merely looking at a gorgeous girl with normal-sized breasts on her chest. Has massive mammary madness taken over my breast-obsessed brain to the point of no return where only girls with giant boobs like Anorei or Jade or Jenny or Sabrina qualify as having truly massive breasts or, even worse, as having big tits at all?! Whilst I ponder with well-endowed worry that my breast perception has been ruined forever in this colossal cleavage conundrum, I’ll leave you to cogitate over the luxurious L-cups of lovely Rachel Aldana in her Green Tile photos and videos from RachelAldana.com:

32L Rachel Aldana Green Tile Photo Galleries from RachelAldana

Rachel Aldana green tile photos from RachelAldana.com    Rachel Aldana green tile photos from RachelAldana.com    Rachel Aldana green tile photos from RachelAldana.com

Rachel Aldana green tile photos from RachelAldana.com    Rachel Aldana green tile photos from RachelAldana.com    Rachel Aldana green tile photos from RachelAldana.com

32L Rachel Aldana Green Tile Video Galleries from RachelAldana

Rachel Aldana green tile videos from RachelAldana.com    Rachel Aldana green tile videos from RachelAldana.com

Rachel Aldana green tile videos from RachelAldana.com    Rachel Aldana green tile videos from RachelAldana.com

CLICK HERE TO VISIT 32L RACHEL ALDANA AT RACHELALDANA.COM

RachelAldana.com

Share and Enjoy

→ Return to MyBoobSite for More Big Tits ←

MyBoobSite.com - F-cup & up big boobs blog for the breast-obsessed

28 Responses to “Normal-Sized Boobs or Truly Massive Tits?”

  1. Mammary Man Says:

    Yes, I believe you’ve been perverted. Rachel’s tits are absolutely massively wonderful, and more so when considering the proportions of fat versus non-fat. The other large ladies you mentioned have massive breasts in large part due to the excess fat on their bodies. Rachel is more special (in my opinion) because she has less fat, making her assets all the more incredible and rare. Smaller breasts, yes. But more precious and rare. Same goes for Anya and so many others on your site. The skinnier the girl with large breasts, the more my legs go weak. Maybe that’s a perversion in itself!

  2. bobjfs Says:

    I think lovely Rachel would be shocked to hear you consider her breasts as normal sized. She is at least two standard deviations from any mean I’ve seen. Perhaps we need a better definition for “normal”?

  3. henk Says:

    Those shots are getting a bit predictable… Apart from the odd rubbing, there’s not much happening is there? How about some nipple sucking, Rachel?

  4. Tony Says:

    really has heavy tits, but im not into big tits as much as I use to be, there is a world of hot young sluts out there needing to be had

  5. Leneyoyo Says:

    My Gawd! I just realised I feel and think the same way… Ms Aldana, looks so normal to me now…
    If it only were true… but it’s just the boob madness in my head… well I really can’t complain.

  6. QT3456 Says:

    I recently have been having the same problem. I’ll find myself not even blogging those girls I would categorize at “big boobs,” and instead only blog “huge boobs.” I tried to have a reproducible standard for separating big boobs from huge boobs, but they have become impossibly intertwined.

  7. Dingleberry Says:

    Those things are bigger than her head man, if you’re calling that a “normal” size, either you’ve got problems, or I need to move to your neighbourhood!

  8. bestgirls Says:

    a question without an answer is a paradox or a rhetorical question, so thats just not funny…..but yea

  9. surplusexistance Says:

    Your perceptions of normality have changed through frequent use. Someone who regularly sees F cup and above will no longer think of it as big, as everyone has it. What you need to do is go and look at small breasts for a while. Once you start thinking that a B is average, D will seem large, F huge, and J,K, and l will seem gigantic in comparison.

    There’s a scientific name for this, that I don’t remember, but it’s all to do with desensitisation to something. The more you see something, the more you get used to something, the less emotion it evokes. In this case you’ve got used to large breasts, and thus your standards of large have increased because your brain is still wired with “big boobs are sexy” but your definition of big has slipped further up the scale where only people like Anorei will satisfy. If you surrounded yourself with smaller boobs for a while, when you return to big boobs, even the things you now consider normal, and not currently big, will seem far larger.

  10. Zargouski Says:

    To think that Mis Aldana has normal sized boobs is not anything BUT maddness. I think you should be checking yourself into a shrink right away. She’s massive. I would have to agree with Mammary Man. For me, it’s all about belly to boob propotion. Wile I do love a nice and curvy girl, say Dors Feline for example, as much if not more than a skinny girl, I feel that there is a point where sheer body mass ruins a nice big pair of boobs, particulary if her belly extends beyond her boobs.

    But each to his own, for I certainly will not condemn you for your taste. Big girls need love too!

  11. Bism Says:

    I think with Rachel there’s also the shape/firmness to consider. Her breasts ARE normal breasts (pretty great ones in fact) – just much, much bigger. That’s her special appeal to me.

    So she does look kind of normal until she moves about or pushes them together and you get a proper sense of size, at which point my mind promptly collapses.

    While I am sure there’s a good deal of desensitisation going on with the number of pure size, ultra-giant tits you spend your days looking at, I would imagine Rachel’s singularly extreme ‘small, firm, shapely boobs grown gigantic’ genetic lottery win is having its own effect.

    I do wish she’d act up a bit in her videos though, that’s true. Seeing a bit more of a sense of humour and some more vigorous movement would do me the world of good. Probably better off saying that on her website rather than this one, I imagine.

  12. Tomasz Says:

    A premise should be made. Rachel Aldana has an overestimated boobs size. She’s not an L- and not even a K-cup. She must be max. a J-cup, but can be an H/I-cup as well. Her tits are not bigger than Maria Moore’s, Renee Ross’ or Milena Velba’s and none of those claims to be bigger than J-cup.
    To Mammary Man:
    I have the same likes. :-)
    To surplusexistance:
    What You look the scientific name for, in my country sometimes is humorously called the gynecologist syndrome. :-)

  13. x Says:

    Rachel is the perfect woman ! She should be the standard all other big breasted women are measured by !

    I’ll do the measuring…. :)

  14. Tony Says:

    the law of diminishing marginal utility

  15. GraphicBrat Says:

    There is some truth to what you say in that after some time of viewing only extra large breasted women (E cup +) massive mammary madness tends to change your perspective on what a ‘normal’ size woman’s breasts would be. I myself had to realize this when I was talking to a friend of mine about some girls tits and I said that her boobs were ‘too small’, only later to find out she was a DD cup.

    I had to see something about me had change to think that DD’s were too small. It’s my love for FF, HH & JJ cups had blinded me to what average or ‘normal’ tit sizes truly are. This goes without speaking on the mega titters like Anorei , Jade, Jenny or Sabrina you mentioned .

    Rachel Andana 32L tits are truly massive by no stretch the imagination, she is still well above average size in comparison to most of the girls on your blog. I think you too have become blinded by massive mammary madness from the never-ending parade of titan tits which we all come to love so very much.

  16. Reese Says:

    Tomasz Said:

    A premise should be made. Rachel Aldana has an overestimated boobs size. She’s not an L- and not even a K-cup. She must be max. a J-cup, but can be an H/I-cup as well. Her tits are not bigger than Maria Moore’s, Renee Ross’ or Milena Velba’s and none of those claims to be bigger than J-cup.

    I have to disagree with you there, Tomasz, as Rachel was professionally measured and fitted by premiere bra manufacturer Royce Lingerie on mainstream German TV May 22nd, 2008. This, unlike some of the other models you’ve mentioned who have no independent third-party documentary evidence to support their large cup-size claims, Rachel’s a confirmed L-cupper. ;~)

    Cheers,
    ~Reese! :~)

  17. Tomasz Says:

    To Reese:
    OK. She may be an L-cup, but then the mentioned three have wrong measures. The look says it. Just see them and make the visual comparison. Their boobs just don’t look smaller than hers.

  18. Boss82 Says:

    Excellent point surplus!! Absolutely true

  19. Charles Says:

    Milena Velba has far far larger and heavier breasts than Rachel. No question that Rachel is world class and one in 100 million, but Milena is still prettier and without question bigger.

    Now as for your big boob madness, don’t worry, it’s not an illness that needs curing!! All the better for you since you have so many above average girls courting your attention and giving you this bias in the first place. Consider yourself a visionary and seek out bigger breasts and bigger cleavage than ever. We all think it’s great!

    I would like to see that fitting with Rachel. Rachel is still a goddess and I would look forward to seeing her find a man and show us her version of motherhood like Lorna Morgan.

  20. Hankloveshooters4ever Says:

    GAWD! She is still dynamic, gentlemen. Let’s not quibble over perspectives. Those are huge nonetheless and I enjoy seeing them (.)(.). ;D

  21. radic Says:

    It is said everything is relative. My simple gauge of boobisize is in relation to the size of the head. If a gal sports a pair as large or larger than hear head, then in my book that is big. Back in the day blooming goddesses would wear big hair, which in my view masked the size of the boobage.

    Another gauge in my youth was the rear view… as I recall back in the day many upper body garments offered a bit of a see-thru look, seeing the width of the back of the bra would often correspond with the cup size. The more amply endowed tended to wear the more industrial strength variety (still my preference in bras btw) with a wide four or even five hook back. Seeing that would always require maneuvering to get a look at the front.

  22. Mark Says:

    > She is at least two standard deviations from any mean I’ve seen.
    > Perhaps we need a better definition for “normal”?

    Two standard deviations?? Last I checked, average was around a C-cup and each cup-size was one SD; this being the case, a pair of L-cup breasts is NINE standard deviations up. Even if my information is wrong and 1 SD is 2 cups, implying that 15% of all women have breasts of A or smaller and 15% have breasts E-sized and up, L-cup breasts would still be over four standard deviations away from the average, which is rarer than one in a hundred thousand. Think about it – even keeping your eyes out for bust women, how many can you remember seeing who are as big as Rachel?

  23. Maria Moore Says:

    It is so funny how warped we can become regarding breast size. Some mornings, while showering, I feel my breasts and think ..”wow, they feel so small today!” Now we know this is never the case…

    Just curious though..when I traveled to London, and purchased bras there, the sizes were different..so I looked it up and while I do believe Rachel’s boobies to be extraordinary , if she measures as a UK L cup…her size should be equal to that of a US HH cup. I could be wrong..I did a simple google search…

    Rachel appears so massive because she is a tiny girl..her band size is a 32! She is very petite, so her breasts are very pronounced on her slim frame.

    I think the whole cup thing is so over rated..I still myslef billed as a 44ff by one company???

  24. jerry Says:

    If you factor in Karola’s breasts it completely changes the scale we are using to judge what is massive. Sure Rachel is huge by any standard especially in light of her proportions but Karola is in her own league and it is even hard to imagine that she is real and her breasts are flawless.

  25. Vadd Says:

    Having Maria Moore (a perfect woman if there ever was one) comment on an article featuring Rachel Aldana (the OTHER perfect woman) is enough to make my head explode. In a good way.

  26. Lomitus Says:

    Clearly what is considered “big” let alone ” massive” is certainly subjective to begin with. If you search “massive boobs” on the internet often you will find sites, pictures and movies of women who would barely qualify as a D cup (and it’s rather annoying really). For that matter if you just search “biggest breasts” often you’ll find women who simply aren’t -that- impressive at all. Yea, sure you’ll run across the occasional picture of women like the great Norma Stitz or Maxi Mounds but just as often you find women that I think a great many of us true breast lovers would consider “average”.

    That said, frequent exposure and “desensitization” can also certainly be factors in regards to our perceptions. More directly I think it’s often just a matter of our tastes and our perceptions changing as we start to get a bit older. Perhaps this shows my age a bit but I remember being a young lad in my mid teens and have one of those classic posters of Farrah Faucet in my bed room and back in those days here breasts just seemed soooo big. I saw that same poster not terribly long ago and was actually a bit shocked as now she seems soooo flat chested compared with images of women that I typically enjoy! LOL! In a day and age where we have models such as Anorie Collins, Jade (Belle), Norma Stitz and of course the legendary Chelsea Charms, etc., etc., -and- we have “morph artists” (such as myself) who make these women EVEN BIGGER (and bigger and bigger!)…and I think many of us who enjoy this sort of thing do get a bit used to seeing images like this…it’s really no wonder that a beautiful woman such as Rachel there just seems “average” if not even a bit “small” by today’s standards.

    That said, I really don’t think there is anything wrong with this either. In any case this is all really about “fantasy” more than anything else. Clearly with resources such as the internet, a great many people can explore their fantasies in ways that simply weren’t possible even 20 years ago. BE/expansion/inflation fantasies, GTS, FMG, BBW/SSBBW and a great many others can be easily explored with a few clicks of a mouse. Most people usually agree that a “healthy” fantasy life is actually a very good thing…as long as one can separate those fantasies from reality at some point. In my own case I -know- the woman I love and share my life with will NEVER be as well endowed as someone like Karola, Anorie Collins, Jade or the great Susie Sparks (who’s almost starting to seem a bit smaller by today’s standards) but that doesn’t mean that I love her any less. When the computer monitor get’s turned off, I’m still quite happy with the “real” woman that I love so much (and yes…she’s aware of my fantasies as well…she doesn’t always understand them, but she knows and accepts them for what they are…fantasies).

    So with that all said, as long as you’re not developing a deeper relationship with your computer monitor than the real person who is actually in your life, it’s not something I would really worry about -too- much…enjoy the eye candy for what it is.

  27. Vlad Says:

    Such high standards and I love that you are dedicated to only featuring big (in my book, that’s really huge ) breasts.
    I think D is big (small for you). Small for me is A and B, while C is normal. Anything beyond DD/E is huge and Extra Huge!!!

    To me the minimum big size is if she is on her back, and you placed your dick between her breasts, she should be able to hide your dick. If she “hot dog buns” them, they are normal, and if she can’t even grasp them, they are too small.

    The question I can’t seem to answer is what is PERFECT. You feature so many great breasts on here is hard to choose. I’m a big fan of slim and stacked and that is my preference, but there are some thicker women on here that are so hot too that I cannot discriminate.

  28. Rob Says:

    Om e thing you guys have to understand is that cup size is not measured by breast size alone. The size of the women’s torso is the deciding fact. You can take 2 women with the identical size boobs, but the one with a smaller torso measurement will have a bigger cup size.

Leave a Reply

IMPORTANT: Due to excessive spam, links are no longer permitted in comments and any comment containing the characters http:// will be automatically blocked. So, if you really need to leave us a link, simply leave off the http:// bit and just start with the www. instead! ;~)