Comments on: The Girls of Silicone Valley

By: Michele Cati

Michele Cati — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:24:01 +0000

Evviva il polipropilene!!!

By: Reese

Reese — Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:09:33 +0000

Rocco~

‘Course not! ;~) Then again, if you’ve been following MyBoobSite since the beginning, you’ll know that I could care less whether they’re naturals or surgically enhanced – I just love big boobs! (oYo)

Merry Christmas (well, what’s left of it, at least)…
~Reese! :~)

By: Rocco

Rocco — Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:46:22 +0000

I guess their bad boob jobs are not stopping you from making a few bucks off them as a revenue partner, right?

By: Reese

Reese — Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:22:20 +0000

jalabi~ Thanks for reminding me of that! The models you'd mentioned certainly do have the now-rare string implants which integrate with the existing flesh. I'd first heard of them some 20 years ago, but had totally forgotten since... Cheers, ~Reese! :~) P.S. ...in thanks for the reminder, here are 3 more Keisha Evans galleries: Keisha Evans - Gallery 1 Keisha Evans - Gallery 2 Keisha Evans - Gallery 3

By: jalabi

jalabi — Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:34:02 +0000

FYI: Chelsea Charms, Maxi Mounds and BB Gunns do NOT have silicone breast implants. Rather, they have what are known as polypropylene implants, the so-called “silly string”, which makes their breasts continuously grow. That’s the reason why they have such humungous boobs (esp. Chelsea). For more information on these (now discontinued pending FDA approval) implants, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polypropylene or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast_implant

PS: you should talk more about Keisha Evans, and her amazingly large ones

By: humenflash

humenflash — Sun, 04 Dec 2005 07:01:55 +0000

IMPRESSIVE