Ah, the curious case of Rachel Aldana. Browsing through her latest photo shoot over at PinUpFiles, I came to a rather strange realisation. Although I find Rachel to be immensely attractive (albeit a wee bit “Stacey from EastEnders”, save for the big tits) with a slim & super stacked figure that can’t be beat by virtue of the boobs to body ratio afforded by those huge L-cup breasts on such a diminutive frame, I simply harbour no desire whatsoever to fuck her.
Odd, huh? It’s not for a lapse of libido, either, as I can easily come up with an extensible list of big breast models with whom I’d love to have sex. In fact, big boobs aside for a moment, there are plenty of GWSTILFs – i.e. girls with small tits I’d like to fuck – as well!
So what is it about lovely little Miss L-cups that could account for this alarming “look but don’t touch” attitude? Well, perhaps that’s a bit of an overstatement as I’d certainly not turn down the chance to grope those gorgeous globes given half the opportunity but, unlike other such well-endowed women, I’d be moreso inclined just to stand back from her rack and admire it from afar as if a member of some bizarre asexual big breast appreciation society. Meh. Maybe it’s just PinUpFiles who’s to blame for presenting their topless models in a more objectively artistic than sexual context. Again, meh.
Well, whatever the case, since I do like looking purely on the basis of big breast aethetics even if there’s no element of lust involved in the equation, here are a few sample sized pics of the lovely 30L Rachel Aldana from her most recent photo shoot for PinUpFiles.com:
Amazing figure
cant agree with, its one oft my favorit dreams to fuck her…
You’re right! I think she is cold and don’t get envolved for what is doing. I miss more atittude from her. But she ‘s so beautiful…
Reese! Give me a break bro! For years now I have been checking out your site and reading your posts as well as checking out the babes. You are a dirty pervert like the rest of us and you know damn well, if Rachel, showed up in your bedroom buck naked, ready, wet and willing, nipples all perky and excited, while you woke with your morning wood, there is no way in hell you would turn her down!! Seriously, NO WAY! LOL.
P.S.
Keep up the great work! Love the site.
I’m with you Reece and Bam, she has that Page 3 look about her, still, she is young and bless her, they are huge globes.
Perfection!
I’m a breast obsessed man, and Rachel is the first breast model in a long time that turns me off.
For me, it’s her round face combined with a large jaw. I find the combo to be a bit masculine.
I also dislike when a girl wears that much mascara, which we call “raccoon eyes” around these parts. I think she knows her eyes aren’t particularly alluring, so that’s why she wears it.
Plus, the major turn-off for me is her areola size. For me, they are disproportionately small to her breasts.
There’s always going to be the guy who comes along and post something like “How can you say these hurtful things to Aldana?”
Well, hate to break to those guys, but she’s in the business of taking your money for her appearance. And if a person doesn’t want to subscribe to a model’s site for its content, I think it’s okay to say why you won’t spend your money there. I’m not attacking Rachel. I’m saying why Rachel will not get my money.
This is just me, mind you.
I’ve seen comments from tons of guys who think she’s gorgeous.
I think a lot of that is just because of her breast size, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Some will agree with me, many will not. I don’t expect my opinion to speak for the masses. :-)
I can understand why you say that. its her areolas! they just don’t go with her breasts. I still love them tho and would jump at the chance to have sex with her
Have to agree, there’s something about her that does nothing for me,
Cant seem to understand why, think I possibly prefer a softer pair like Anya Sakova, and Rachel’s always appear rather hard…
I love the way her nipples are hard and sticking out. Would need the safety goggles with her….
Rachel always seem to look through the camera, not at it (and thus, not at her audience). Without meaning any offence at all she looks like the type of girl who’d have sex, not for sex’s sake, nor for the person she’s doing it with, but rather to get what she’s after. To me Rachel always came across as the bitchy type. I know this might be a very unfair assumption, and I apologise wholeheartedly for it, but she gives this look of someone who’d only have sex with you if it benefited her, and if she could control you afterwards for it.
Basically she’s the school whore. She’s not easy, she doesn’t put out for just anyone, but if it would improve her social standing, she’d do you. Other models either look sultry, or innocent, Rachel looks commanding and bossy, and I don’t just mean in a dominatrix type way. her face always seems to look insincere, like she’ll stab you in the back at any given opportunity, and looking at her face I honestly wouldn’t trust her as far as I could throw her. For me, that’s a turn off right there.
Once again, that’s not to say I wouldn’t do her given the opportunity. She might be entirely different in real life, and I might be very wrong about her. However, unlike many other models who are only too happy too be naked, and seem to enjoy just knowing others think they’re sexy, Rachel’s face seems to suggest she likes being in charge, and she intends to use this command her breasts give her over people to her own ends.
Long story short, she doesn’t look trustworthy, hence she’s just not someone I’d have sex with from everything I’ve seen so far, even inspite of such magnificent mammaries.
In addition; Reese, your comment about “Stacey from Eastenders”. I do see the resemblance, and that doesn’t help. I don’t watch Eastenders religiously, but from what I know, Stacey is a manipulative bitch type character, and is untrustworthy herself, as well as rather chavvy. Kind of like how Rachel always seems to look, and it’s not a desirable look in my humble opinion.
Maybe if you saw her pussy you would change your mind?
Yup…that’s about as perfuckt as a woman can be.
Those Sports Illustrated and Victoria Secret models are tall, leggy and very pretty but for some reason a thick busty babe makes my legs go weak and my gonads twitch.
Forget about those Hollywood scarlets who starve themselves. They are doing a disservice to woman and look more and more like little boys, yuck. The actress that was in those Spiderman movies, Kristen Dunst is a perfect example. She was hot and had a nice set of smaller but shapely breasts. Last time I saw her she was unhealthy looking.
Rachel is stunning. Beautiful. Goddess-like.
I’d love to know her and more.
Then again, to each his own.
Bravo John, well said!
I think I know what your problem is, Reese. Yes, she’s posing topless, but just being naked doesn’t exude sexuality. To me, she doesn’t come off as to want sex. Some models just don’t sell it like that.
And also, she hasn’t flashed you any pink. I think you’ve been classically conditioned, my good man.
Cheers.
Something is wrong in the big tit universe if a woman like Rachel Aldana does nothing for you. Can’t speak for the rest of you guys, but the first thing I want to do when I see Rachel is to fuck the tits off her. You guys who want nothing to do with her are on your own with that talk…..lol.
Could not disagree more. I love Rachel’s look – even without her fantastic chest I would be very attracted to her. I would gladly offer 20K US for one night with Rachel – and I have the cash to back it up.
I would fuck her in a heartbeat. I think if she did some hardcore you all would change your minds about it.
“Look but don’t touch” my ass! I’d suck those gorgeous tits til my head exploded, both of them (heads that is, obvoiusly I’d be sucking both breasts).
Dude, you are SENILE! This girl gets everything going penile! She is going to usurp Chloe Vervier’s spot as the ‘flawless’ brunette in the world of Huge Tits. No one I’d like to mount and root around for ages! No, I do not share your dysfunction. Sorry.
You’re mad reese, just mad.
John,
You are absolutely right: you are not speaking for the masses. “Raccoon eyes”? “A bit masculine”? Goodness me. Give the girl a break.
As for the size of her nipples and areolae compared to her overall breast size, all I can say is: how uniquely wonderful!
And is it necessary to want to fuck every big boob model we look at? What is wrong with simply admiring the aesthetics of big breasts once in a while? I just like to marvel at her physical perfection!
Rachel is the girl of “my current” dreams !
I have to agree about Aldana seeming cold. Her tits are gorgeous, no doubt, but I always feel like she’s just tolerating the camera instead of actually enjoying any part of it. It’s the difference between someone who likes their job and someone who just punches the time card.
I know all the models are working women, they’re out here to make money and God bless ’em, but I like the ones who don’t make it so obvious.
Reese, BAM, Bryanoz, and John
I 100% agree with you guys. I think Rachel is a beautiful woman. She has dark hair, dark eyes and a body that is working overtime. All of the characteristics I love in a woman. However for some reason I do not feel the urge to rub one off over her images or videos. I can’t explain it. I thought I was the only one.
Maybe she comes across as too dark. Oh well I can’t figure it out.
That said Josh is for damn sure correct in saying “if Rachel, showed up in your bedroom buck naked, ready, wet and willing, nipples all perky and excited, while you woke with your morning wood, there is no way in hell you would turn her down!!” Josh you got that right :)
first, i agree. rachel has an awsome body but her sexyness isnt coming thru from her pics. i’ll append her to other chicks with great bods such as Anya, nicole peters and to some extent even nelli roono who all have great-amazing figures but seem relctunt to show themselves and generally not having fun. i guess thats why i would probably fuck them in real life but i wouldnt jerk to thier pics.
love this site reese
keep up the good work here and in the forum
To feed sexual desire, Rachel just needs to more often include a little of her ass and thighs, as she does below. Otherwise she is interesting sculpture:
[mod edit: link removed, returned “Document Not Found” error]
P.S. I’m fascinated by the nospace between her breasts!
Mason & others –
No worries. There are plenty of guys who aren’t really into Rachel.
At a couple of the prominent big breast enthusiast forums, you’d think Rachel was the second coming. The few guys who’ve spoken unfavorably about her have essentially been ganged up on and treated unfairly for not praising her.
But if you venture out to other forums, you’ll find there are plenty of folks who aren’t into her.
It’s all up to individual tastes.
Some love her looks, others don’t. That’s the beauty of diversity.
I just wish all forums would be more forgiving for guys who aren’t on board the never-say-die love for all models.
Some of the model support is a bit scary at times.
While I don’t think anyone should trash a model, I don’t think they should lust over them in an unhealthy fashion either.
Reminds me of the guys who go to gentlemen’s clubs and think they have a relationship with the dancers.
But that’s just my opinion.
I love her. She is my #1 at the moment (in case any regulars here didn’t already know). But I realize that, like everything else in the world, women are a matter of taste.
My favorite criticism of Rachel so far:
“Long story short, she doesn’t look trustworthy…”
-Surplusexistance
I have to agree with you on this one. While she is pretty and stacked beyond my wildest dreams, she comes across as great arm candy, but no sex appeal at all.
This is indeed odd because, with a good photographer, even the ice princess can “look” hot. This has always been the problem with the video sites. The girls look good but once they “come alive” you see they have no presence at all.
Gillian Anderson has always been this way to me. Very attractive but totally asexual. Like the “good girls” in westerns. Pretty, but no action.
Rachel Aldana is sort of an asexual schoolmarm.
I see what you mean.
Does does seem like the type of woman who puts her sexuality in a box and only brings it out for special occasions.
Guys I can’t believe the heresy that I am hearing!
Guys,
I feel I am going to have to stick up for Rachel here as the very traits that have been described concerning her body are actually typical English or Anglo Saxon traits. You’ll find that germanic woman do have small areoli. She has beautiful eyes and hair. She may not be teutonic but you’ll find Gothic looking germaic women do share those traits.
Sorry she doesn’t look like those fake America or Eastern European models who have to pay thousands of dollars just to look like her. In England we make woman like that naturally.
Not to mention her body which is unbelievable. And to be honest that is what I think the real problem is here. She is just too good to be true but she is. Her stats and body are so incredible it is difficult to assess. Therefore we cannot take it serious, and what we cannot take serious we tend not to be able to trigger other responses such as anger, fear, sadness and sexual arousal.
John bring me a girl that comes close and has the same dimensions.
Vadd said: My favorite criticism of Rachel so far:
“Long story short, she doesn’t look trustworthy…”
-Surplusexistance
allow me to expand slightly. I’m quite the fan of the innocent girl-next-door look. I like to see models having fun, and I like to see models who look like they haven’t yet realised how sexy they are (whether that’s true or not). Rachel doesn’t exude that, she exudes a much more sinister, almost bullying expression in some of these pics, and for me that’s a turn off.
It might just be me, but all I see when I look at her are all the girls at school who spent there time smoking behind the bike sheds, and that’s engrained itself for me as a turn off.
To me Rachel is the very definition of big bust perfection. Not only is she huge beyond belief and all-natural but I also find her very attractive. No one comes close to her size on a relatively slim body. I think she’s still quite shy about posing which might make some guys think that she is cold. I think she’s probably only recently come to terms with having such huge breasts and is only starting to enjoy them more. She certainly has the potential to be one of the greatest ever and we should leave her time to develop as a model.
I agree with Reese, John, and the others and I’ve said it before. Rachel is a beautiful young lady but (in my opinion) doesn’t yet have real SEX appeal going. She may in the future, well she probably will in the future but isn’t just now only 18 years old? She may be still a virgin and not had any real sexcapades so its hard to project that if you haven’t done “IT” yet. I rather take on Sapphire or Sam 38g or Maria Moore those are very boobiful and sexy women.
But I do hope Rachel continues to model because if you want perfection she’s it !!! Personally I like imperfection
Gentlemen, stop ganging up on Rachel. Remember, she is still a young girl with a full developed woman’s body. I find her very beautiful and attractive. There is nothing wrong with her eyes. I love the look of her dark sultry eyes. She replaced Lindsey Dawn MacKenzie as number 1 in my heart. I would rather have the pleasure and honour of doing her then Anglina Jolie any day of the week. Someone stated earlier that “she doesn’t look trustworthy”, well I want to taste her in my mouth, not handle my investment portfolio. Get a grip, guys
i really cant see any logevity in rachels career she is obviously in this game for the money and attention it brings.why do we rarely see her get involved and crack a smile with the shoot there is no real teasing going on just a mild titilation pardon the pun.i am getting a little fed up with her attitude and find it a little off putting.yes.she has cracking breasts but that aint everything she nedds a little something else.p.s and please miss a dont do the the customary santas naughty helper shoot this x mas its cheap and nasty. rant done.
She just needs to show more. The industry will eventually grow tired and move on to another model because the same stuff is being produced with her. I agree with some of the comments that she is still a little young in age and to the game and maybe time will change this. Lets hope its not too late when that decision is made to show more. Good luck Rachel.
i have never heard such jealousy! This girl is the best thing in the business at the mo. yes she is young but that is the nature of experience it comes with time. She is from the north of England where the better behaved girls are more prohibited even the ones that take there tops off! That coupled with her northern gritty upbringing means that it will take her longer to adjust to her new unfamiliar, glamour career.
back off!
Tell em Sam! They are all crazy as loons!!
Rachel does absolutely nothing for me. Even with a pair of breasts that spectacular, I can’t get past her face. She is still young, though.
Am I missing something? What’s wrong with her face? She’s beautiful! I would hate to be a woman these days with all these harsh critiques. If drop dead gorgeous, young, slim and stacked women with natural K cup boobs does nothing for you…JESUS….go see a doctor cuz something ain’t right….lol.
Surplusexistance:
Yeah I gotcha on that the first time around. But really, all this is just silly. Her tits are ridiculously perfect. And that goes a LONG way ’round these parts when it comes to lots of other women we see here, so it should for my lovely Rachel as well!
its true guys,
it IS her areola size and nipple shape! they are so little,it makes her breasts look “immature” like its just a little girl,even prepuberal,even asexual, wich is something that doesnt turn me on at all.After all big breast preferences/fetishes come with the preference for femininity and venusian ideals.
anyway, these subtle impressions combined with the huge rack, creates kind of a weird effect.
But of course I could stare at her figure forever.
AND I would gloriously fuck her, simply cause, if she stood next to you in a club, next to these mediocre-figured regular girls, see if u care about nipple shapes then.:)
(I would rather do anya,jana,alicia,EDEN, yulia , though, without thinking twice)
I agree with you Reese. Rachel is amazingly beautiful, but I get the sense from her that she just wouldn’t ENJOY having sex, and that’s a turn off. I mean who wants to fuck a woman who doesn’t want to be there?
I don’t think we’re “ganging up” on her, there are a few here who agree and a few here who do not.
I for one can see both sides of it. I think she’s very attractive. I bought a membership to her new site. But the problem is, she either doesn’t know how to get into her work or she doesn’t care to. One or the other. And while certain girls (September Carrino comes to mind) seem to know there is a breast-obsessed guy watching the videos – and so they show them off, move them around, etc. – Rachel doesn’t seem to get this. I think she feels as though – or has been told – that just standing there will do the trick. It doesn’t.
This is first time i saw such a big boobs!! How u maintain them!!