Biggest Boobs in Britain
I’d received an e-mail over the weekend from a visitor to MyBoobSite who’d heard a joke on Saturday Night Live about a girl named Rachel Aldana who, at a 32JJ, supposedly had the largest breasts in Britain! Having failed to locate any further information on-line, he thought that perhaps I might be able to track her down, citing me as an expert on the subject of boobology who just happens to live in the UK.
Well, Johnny, you’re in luck! I found the original article, entitled “Guinness Boob of Records“, in British newspaper The People. It described Rachel’s massive mammaries as making tabloid celebrity Jordan’s 34FF pair look like poached eggs. The 18-year-old hairdresser from Brackley, Northants, reckons that big breasts run in her family. Her mum was a 36E before being surgically reduced to a C-cup (shame about that), but Rachel has no plans to do anything quite that drastic as yet (good girl!). Her story caught the attention of the Guinness Book of World Records who, believing that Ms. Aldana has the largest natural breasts in all of Britain, offered to immortalize Rachel in their next publication.
But they were wrong. In the week following her story, editors from The People received letters from three women seeking to usurp Rachel’s top titanic tits title. Two of them - Natasha Weston-Mayes & Leanne Darnley, both 19 - boasted 34JJ bust-lines, while 16-year-old Chloe Rogers blew away the competition with her king-sized 34KK knockers! “I couldn’t believe (Rachel Aldana’s) claims,” remarked Chloe, “my boobs are obviously MUCH bigger.” I just love a woman with confidence!
Chloe, Leanne & Natasha all come from families with a history of large bosoms, the latter remarking that hers “obviously has big boobs stretching back generations.” [Wow. The thought of breasts defying the linearity of the space-time continuum. Truly, it boggles the mind. ;~)] Considering the implications, 34JJ Leanne said, “The fact that all three of us have big boobs running in our families seems to suggest that there could be some kind of genetic link. I think a geneticist should look into it. If eye-colour is hereditary, why not boobs? Imagine the possibilities if they discovered a boob gene. You might be able to clone breasts!” Hmmm. Obviously, Leanne hasn’t read this article.
Click here to read the entirety of The People’s followup story, “Record BreaKKers“, or click the following thumbnails for photos (apologies for the quality, but, failing to find any on-line, these were scanned from the original newspaper article):
P.S. Thanks go out to Johnny H. for alerting me to the original story, and to kernowgypsy & keef1 for the scans! :~) Oh, and here’s Leanne, too!
December 13th, 2005 at 2:35 pm
I’d go for 34KK. They’re nice.
December 13th, 2005 at 3:25 pm
Pornster~
You & me both! ;~) I really do think that Chloe Rogers should take maximum advantage of her awesome 34KK assets and pursue a lucrative career in modelling. Then, if she does decide to go through with the breast reduction surgery mentioned in the article… :~( …at least there’d be a historical record for future generations of big breast lovers to enjoy!
~Reese! :~)
December 13th, 2005 at 5:49 pm
Unbelievable!!!¿¿2.4 KG?? O.O
December 13th, 2005 at 8:26 pm
chloe, where have you been all my life? (:
December 14th, 2005 at 3:02 am
Chloe’s 34KK’s would make her rich if she kept them. She has the potential to grow bigger! But she has choosen to butcher them due to peer pressure, what a waste to the world. A prime reason to wipe out bulling in schools, if ever there was one.
The genetic research side has great potential to solves the world problem of flat breasted women and reduce the amount of silicone in the world. Natural is best.
December 14th, 2005 at 6:48 am
I am especially glad to see them all being young, cute girls too! I may be wrong (hope I am!) but arn’t cup sizes different in the UK than in the U.S.? So a D cup is really a C cup, etc…?
December 14th, 2005 at 7:03 am
Man, all those girls are pretty sexy. I just hope that they can find other means of holding on to their breasts they are wonderful.
December 14th, 2005 at 8:16 am
It looks to me like several of the women in the pics here (British guy’s website) http://www.studiob.freeserve.co.uk/friends.htm have Chloe’s 34KK’s beat by a country mile, and especially the one labeled Wendy. Click on her pic for even more wondrous watermelon sized boob pics.
I would estimate, visually, that each of Wendy’s breasts, if freed from the pull of gravity, would be spheres about 8″ or 20cm in diameter, a bit smaller than a soccer ball. Using the formula 4/3 Pi r cubed, the volume of a 20 cm sphere is about 4.5 liters or ten pounds (US). Assuming that the density if breast tissue is the same as water, the weight woulld then be 4.5kg per breast. That’s half again as heavy as Chloe’s 34KK’s! Man, those are some BIG boobs! @@
December 14th, 2005 at 10:00 am
Wow - I don’t think I’ve ever had so many comments so quickly on a post! I do agree that it’s a shame bullying is responsible for the negative attitudes these girls have about their beautiful breasts. I can understand the very real problems potentially arising from the physical issues of carrying so much weight up front, but the psychological issues stemming from the taunts and mistreatment are totally out of order. Why can’t people just show these girls some respect, let alone admire their natural beauty?
It wasn’t too long ago that I’d mentioned the case of 16-year-old Stephanie Mann, whose 36K breasts were being reduced to a D-cup because of the emotional anguish she suffered at school. As the article didn’t mention any physical complications, Stephanie’s troubles with her breasts all come down to the cruelty of others. :~(
By the way, if the reporter from The People had read Stephanie’s story in The Telegraph last month, he’d have known that Rachel Aldana wasn’t the biggest! Oh well, I guess if he had, we wouldn’t have had these lovely ladies to look at. ;~)
vadd: The only difference I’m aware of between UK & U.S. bra sizes is that an E-cup over here is typically called a DDD-cup in the ‘States. Apart from that, there aren’t really any differences. The cup sizes in Continental Europe are one cup-size larger upon reaching a DD-cup, and then go linearly through the alphabet (the only double letter they have is AA). Here’s a chart detailing the differences. I’d also blogged the issue of cup-size confusion late last week, citing some other possible reasons for the discrepancies.
Very Free: There is a slight difference in density between breast tissue and water, so you’d have to multiply your result by a factor 0.9 for an accurate weight. However, I seriously doubt the girls in the article used a method as thorough and scientifically sound as your own (just popping them up on scales, as I’ve seen in some photo shoots, has to be the least accurate method going - short of a wild guess!). Personally, I prefer my own water displacement method, detailed here. ;~)
Thanks, all, for the comments!
~Reese! :~)
December 15th, 2005 at 7:55 am
haah thats my bit of northern stuff,thanks i couldnt get hold of the pic just the write up so now ive seen it thanks for that.anyway any work for her wed love let us know,jjohnthedon@aol.com,rachell aldana im on about,let me tell you too that pic dont do her justice.cya all and happy boobing
December 19th, 2005 at 4:52 am
Wow, Chloe is stunning. Too bad she wants to get them reduced.
December 19th, 2005 at 8:15 am
I wonder how strange sizes are there in UK! When I saw the pics of these young beatiful ladies, the biggest chest among these girls is the Chloe´s one and she could be hardly a H cup ine EU size. Have a look at Eden Mor´s site, where she claims she has H cups and the size looks a way too different from these ladies!
December 19th, 2005 at 3:29 pm
Come on, guys. Those bra sizes are not entirely accurate. For one thing, if Natasha is really a 36JJ, I’ll eat my hat! She is placed right next Chloe who claims that she is a 36KK, and her boobs are miles bigger than Natasha’s. Another thing: apparently, in Britain, you don’t have any single-letter bra sizes, or else why would all of these women (Natasha, Leanne, Chloe and Rachel) be claiming to be KK or JJ cups? Where I come from, a JJ = K cup and a KK = L cup, so why don’t they just say that?
And even though having boobs that weigh 5 kg is no small potatoes, models such as Maxi Mounds (who is currently the Guinness record-holder for biggest implanted boobs) routinely carry around busts that weigh more: Maxi’s boobs weigh 20 pounds EACH (I saw a video of her from the Cristina Show where she had them weighed). I wish that someone would get to Chloe and tell her that her problems would be solved if she would just get herself a well-fitted bra. Backache and all that would be a thing of the past if she would do that, and also do some back- and shoulder-strengthening exercises as well. She need not go through the pain and trouble of a breast reduction if she did.
IMO, Chloe is the biggest of the four, followed by Rachel, then Leanne, and then Natasha. And NONE of them can claim to be the “biggest boobs in Britain”; as Very Few correctly pointed out, Studio B’s Wendy is clearly larger than them. Even that model at eMelons is bigger than these girls, as lovely as they all are. (Rachel has the most stunning eyes!) I wish them all well, and I also wish Chloe would consider modeling — she would give even Eden Mor a run for her money if she did!
December 20th, 2005 at 4:22 pm
A shame that she has to go through surgery to feel secure and happy but it’s understandale in more than one way, older guys stalking them and other women giving them hell just for something so natural, it could make any other woman (well-endowed or not) go crazy but still a shame…..
December 22nd, 2005 at 12:34 am
im one of the girls in the paper and yes we do have single bra sizes in England. And you can’t solve backache with a good bra, i’ve been fitted properly for a bra and my problem is not solved.
December 22nd, 2005 at 3:42 pm
I knew someone while i was in college who was a 34JJ. she’s since emigrated, but she never had an real back problem. She said it was all down to a well fitting bra, and more importantly posture. but i guess everyone is different.
December 27th, 2005 at 1:25 pm
Hi Leanne, thanks for replying. If indeed you have been fitted with a proper bra and you are still suffering from back ache, you may have to do something about your posture. Best of luck on that one!
December 27th, 2005 at 2:56 pm
thanks
December 27th, 2005 at 11:48 pm
YES, there are differences in UKs bra sizes to other countries. Cloe´s 34KK is actually an H-cup in the US and for example an G-cup in Germany. NICOLE PETERS wears an US F-cup, that menas an J-cup in the UK.
NO, JJ is NOT the same as K, and KKK is NOT the same as M. The double- and tripple-sizes are steps between the letters, cause especially with huge cups, the difference in size between the letters are big, so they need sizes between them, cause a huge and heavy breast neads to fit exactly, for comfortable life with them.
NO, volume and weight are not the same with natural breasts. The specific weight is 0.65, that means a breast of 1000 cc has a weight of 650 g only (1.4 lbs). But an implant of 1000 cc weights 1 kg (2.2 lbs).
If Cloe´s breast would be really 3 kg each - they would have a volume of 4600 ccm each, that would get a look like Keisha Evans before her last enlargement.
In the UK they everytime did talk things bigger then they are.
December 28th, 2005 at 12:43 am
So Leanne (hi), you just accept your backproblems or are you still searching for solutions, what about physical therapy, aren’t there any specialists for this particular thing? And can’t you convince Chloe and Natasha that the op could affect their chances too of breast-feeding a baby in the future?;)
December 28th, 2005 at 10:51 pm
I am a very good friendof Rachel Adanas!!
I would just like to say to chole and natasha that they shouldn’t b so harsh on Rachel. it wasn’t her that claimd she has the biggest boobs in britain, it was the newspaper and she knows that there are bigger boobs out there! she was asked to do a photo shoot for the people and they printed what they wanted to. Rachel is a very successfull hairdresser for tony anf guy and is doing well with her modeling. i wish people would praise her for having a nice pair, rather than slagging her off. and chloe’s boobs look horrible that big, Rachels and Natashas look nice!!!!
December 28th, 2005 at 11:39 pm
Who is slagging who off?
If the newspaper wrongfully wrote that Rachel claimed to have the biggest boobs in Britain, then maybe they also wrongfully wrote things about what Chloe and Natasha said about Rachel. Maybe I have missed something, but if you are referring to “Record BreaKKers” I don’t read that Chloe and Natasha are particularly harsh on Rachel.
And what a horrible thing to say about Chloe. I don’t understand how you can be a friend of beautifully stacked Rachel, and thus be aware about the relentless nastyness largely boobed women receive, and say something that nasty about a girl who has one cupsize bigger boobs, or two, whatever, all those girls are damn gorgeous.
Kinda makes me wonder if I’m reacting to some fool who just wrote some crap.
December 29th, 2005 at 1:22 am
small rectification:
1. …be aware of…
2. …all those girls LOOK damn gorgeous. (I don’t know if they ARE gorgeous because their personalities are an essential factor for that qualification, and I obviously don’t know them personally)
December 29th, 2005 at 3:32 pm
I understand what you are saying joery and i apologise. My words came out in anger as Rachel has recieved nasty messages about her compared to chloe and I didn’t think about what i was saying!!
December 29th, 2005 at 4:40 pm
accepted (on behalf of Chloe, if I may)
January 2nd, 2006 at 2:34 pm
Wow!!!!!
January 3rd, 2006 at 6:28 pm
i would just like to say on behalf of myself if those other three girls lost weight….. they wouldnt be half the size they are, i weigh 10 stone and a size 8 waist…. your boobs look disgusting my bbob section compered to yours look awful where you have had to pull them up, im very proud of mine
January 3rd, 2006 at 8:06 pm
Chloe, if you are reading this, please do not get a breast reduction as your breasts look wonderful. Most people love bigger breasts and they are something to be proud off. I think they llok awesome and I really love your look. You are such a pretty young girl and I am astounded with what nature has given you. Have you thought about modelling as you would make so much money. Please keep those amazing breasts and how about appearing on British TV, like Trisha or something, so all us guys can judge for ourselves. If Chloe or any of her friends read this, please respond Thanks
January 3rd, 2006 at 8:29 pm
Word Sean. Go Chlo-ee Go Chlo-ee
January 3rd, 2006 at 10:07 pm
Why so spiteful Rachel?
January 3rd, 2006 at 11:21 pm
Once again, Chloe please get in touch if your out there. Your breasts are simply too good to go to waste. You could be the next Linsey Dawn Mckenzie honey!!
January 4th, 2006 at 12:05 am
You don’t have to be a pin-up girl Chloe.
Explore the benefits of your heavenly body befor you permanently deprive yourself of that.
Don’t let them mutilate yourself.
January 4th, 2006 at 10:15 pm
Chloe you are a dream. You have breasts to die for!!
January 5th, 2006 at 12:25 am
Is this really Rachel Aldana who’s replied to this or someone just trying to stir up trouble?
Of all of the 4 girls Rachel looks the most naturally beautiful, and I am aware of how journalists can manipulate articles but of the four Rachel came across as extremely down to Earth and its a shame people have been so spiteful to her.
January 5th, 2006 at 1:47 am
I was also wondering about that, Davey. Perhaps “A Friend of Rachels” can tell us if that was really Rachel. Her apology was pretty convincing…. with this posting system it’s too easy to manipulate things.
I guess the only way to be certain that the 4 girls are réally joining us, is when this becomes a User Registration Forum, and that the girls would send a unique picture with their identity to ensure it’s really thém speaking to us. (not because I want the girls to be sending naked pictures or something of themselves. A fully clothed picture would be excellent; it’s just to know it’s réally them.) It would give them a solid platform to speak and their presence would do all of us booblovers a great service.
Administrators, work on it.
ps. see how I altered my name from joery to Joery.
January 5th, 2006 at 3:37 am
No problem Joery, point well illustrated.
The reason i question whether that really is Rachel is the spiteful nature of her message (as you pointed out yourself Joery).
I mean i could be totally wrong here, because a few lines of text don’t exactly project a persons entire personality, but when i saw the People article with Rachel Aldana she came across as down to Earth and intelligent. It was almost as though she was a reluctant “record holder.”
Rather than boasting about her natural chest size and her obvious good looks she seemed to be saying “yeah thats all good but theres more to me than a pair of tits.”
Like I say, I could be wrong, the journalist could have worded the article to suit how he wanted it to appear, but after reading it I was as impressed with how she came across verbally as how she was physically.
Then we get a slightly bitchy and miss spelt post on here that didn’t make a lot of sense, I am just a bit sceptical that Rachel herself would drop to that level.
January 5th, 2006 at 4:37 pm
I hereby call on everybody to participate in freezing this most interesting thread and collectively insist on the Administrator(s) to create a User Registration Forum (if there is a proper web-term or abbreviation for “user registration forum”, please enlighten me) so we can continue this open discussion on a much more reliable basis. (I realize there are downsides to this system, such as the possibility of elitism, but I’m ok with that).
Or at least elaborate on it.
Administrator, if you have deliberately avoided this kind of a posting system, please tell us what you think of it anyway.
I’m saying this because I think we have reached a dead end, where someone will only occasionally shout: “please Chloe, don’t have the reduction!” (which I’m pretty gutted about) and “I like Rachel more” and possible topheavy women won’t bother to join in with the discussion because people will constantly wonder if it’s really them.
January 5th, 2006 at 5:23 pm
Maybe it was a bad idea.
As I once more read my own post I more and more am overcome by the same nauseating feeling I get from visiting the Anekee-forum.
To be totally honest it was an attempt to ultimately try to change Chloe’s mind about having a breastreduction, about which I’m probably equally messed up as Sean. (great passion man)
But WTF, one last attempt; Leanne Darnley, I’m pretty sure your post was genuine. So if you read this; you must be able to get in touch with Chloe (and Natasha, sorry…). I do realize topheavy women face backproblems, but apart from back/breast-support I think a lot of them just need some moral support to compensate for the terror they receive and makes a lot of them decide to have their astounding features taken away forever. I know maybe you can’t be bothered to do this, but if you have for instance her (their, sorry…) e-mailaddress, you could at least send her a link to this webpage or something, it will only take a minute or two. She’s only 16, probably very insecure as all teenagers are and therefor much too young to make such an irreversible decision. Thank you.
January 5th, 2006 at 10:13 pm
Ah! Administrator is Reese right? How silly of me. Reese.
January 6th, 2006 at 8:29 pm
Yeah, Chloe should get in touch. As far as big natural boobs go, I admit I am messed up!! Chloe has the best set of natural boobs I have seen in a long time and I include such greats as Linsey Dawn, Chloe Vevrier and Bea Flora in relation to that.
Chloe, please reconsider having a breast reduction as your god-given talents are astounding!! If you are reading this or if any of Chloe’s friends are reading, please get in touch with us. Chloe, you are amazing plain and simple!!
January 7th, 2006 at 1:59 am
hi this is natasha here,
first of all i would like to say we never said anything horrible about rachel, we never mentioned her the reporter did, the reporter also twisted things round too. yes chloe said hers were obviously bigger but she was speaking the truth she was not trying to hurt anyone.
Im not a 36jj im a 34 and chloe is not a kk just a k, we also never claimed we were the biggest we were just the biggest to get in touch with the paper, and no diesrespect to chloe or leanne but mine dont look as big as i was holding them properly i have the original picture where you can clearly see all of my boobs the scanned picture washes them out.
im not having mine reduced because of pressure or bullying i couldnt care less what others thought of me thats there opinion, im having it done as i dont want to live the rest of my live with back ache shoulder pain etc, its ok for all you men to say oh you should keep them there lovely try living with them you would get the idea of what we go through then youd see why we are making this decision.
also the reporter estimated the weight of chloes by what was written about rachels weight.
just wanted to have my say Rachel if you read this good luck to you if i was`nt ill i would be trying to carry on doing modelling as i loved the day it was great, we never said anything bitchy, i know im certainly not like that.
tasha
January 7th, 2006 at 3:45 am
Tasha: Thanks so much for sticking it out and finally being able to respond. Vix & I are well acquainted with the press because of her Tits Out for MS charity, and we know how words can get turned around. Best of luck to your in your health and whatever you pursue.
Joery: Yes, I’m the sole administrator of MyBoobSite. I’ve stayed away from a registration-only forum as many visitors, like Natahsa, were having trouble posting their thoughts. I want to keep things as open as possible…and if that means not knowing someone’s true identity, then so be it. I respect everyone’s right to express their opinion, even if they choose to remain anonymous.
As for the women featured in the articles who have posted comments here, the only one I can vouch for is Natasha, as she had corresponded with me prior to posting. As administrator, I have access to the unique IP addresses of everyone who posts here, and hers matches that of her e-mail address. Thus, you are left to decide whether or not the others are genuine on your own.
I wholly support any decisions that Natasha, Leanne, Chloe & Rachel make regarding themselves. After all, it’s their bodies, and they have to live with that each day. As much as I love big breasts and find each of them stunning in their own right, whatever they decide is best for themselves is, truly, entirely up to them.
Cheers,
~Reese! :~)
January 7th, 2006 at 5:16 pm
bummer.
January 7th, 2006 at 7:16 pm
Well it’s good to have heard from Natasha and that she has shed some light on the whole article.
Its a shame that her health problems are getting in the way of her dreams as she seems a nice lass and she definitely has the looks and body to be a model.
Fair points about the registration Reese, my only worry about it was the person posting as Rachel Aldana just seemed a little bit too bitchy to be real, you’d also think that if it was genuinely her trying to make a point she’d have at least checked the spelling of her post.
Like I said, despite the fact we know the People are good at twisting and manipulating comments in their articles, Rachel came across as a decent young woman and it was refreshing compared to some of the usual airhead bitchiness you get from people who have been well blessed in the looks/body department.
Unfortunately she’s had to endure a lot of stick because of her boob size, the fact she was even in the article and it would just be an even bigger shame for someone to make it worse by posting rubbish in her name.
January 7th, 2006 at 9:00 pm
I still wonder where Chloe stands. In the article she says she can’t afford a specially made bra, a very dubious argument for such a radical operation…ok, not entirely fair…
The fact is, she’s still growing. Many 16 year olds have fysical problems which are gone when they’re 20. Maybe in 4 years she has a strong back. Also, when I look at Chloe, I simply think she is perfectly healthy and therefor needs no operation.
Natasha, can you ask Chloe to give a bonafide reaction like you did in cooperation with Reese or at least send her a link to this page?
Thanks anyway. And if we don’t hear from you anymore, all the best.
January 7th, 2006 at 10:49 pm
I would like to reply to the comments on this site, as I am Chloe’s mum.
I went with Chloe for the photo shoot at the Sunday People and met Natasha and Leanne. At no time did any of them say anything nasty about Rachel they were all there for the experience and a fun day out. Chloe is having a reduction due to the problems that having a bust this size is causing her. This includes back pain and shoulder which are very red and sore, at times the bra straps even break the skin causing bleeding.
The reporter twisted a lot of what all three of the girls said. We have no idea how much chloe’s boobs weigh, the reporter guessed. Also it says that Chloe comes from a family with a history of large boobs, again this is not true. none of us can work out where they come from.
Buying a bra is impossible as the biggest we can get without having it hand made is 32JJ which costs £36 Chloe is only 16 and a student so she cannot afford this and neither can I. When all of her friends are buying pretty bras for £5.99 and she has to pay a fortune for what looks like scaffolding, you can imagine she gets quite fed up.
January 7th, 2006 at 11:42 pm
This is a further reply from the comments on this site. I can back up Julie (Chloe’s mum) with what she has just said, I have seen the damage that having a big bust size can cause. I am truly ashamed of some of these comments on this website, chloe has done this photo shoot because she has taken an interest of modeling.
January 7th, 2006 at 11:48 pm
Hello Julie. I can’t believe it’s actually true that she might get her beautiful breasts taken away because she or her family never had enough money to buy a custommade bra to try and find out if that is the solution to her problem. And what I don’t understand is: the People made a lot of money from publishing the photos of the 4 girls, believe me. Are you saying Chloe didn’t even get enough money for it to buy her a specially-made bra (100 pounds)?
Are you saying it takes a hundred pounds to find out if the operation might not be necessary?
January 8th, 2006 at 12:02 am
Joery, In reply to your last comment…….The bras that Chloe wears at the moment are too small as they do not make off the pegs sizes to fit her, this means that they are very uncomfortable. A custom made bra starts at £80.
None of the three girls were paid anything for this photo shoot. We were paid our travel expences only.
You try walking around all day with 2 5lb bags of potatos strapped to your chest…..you may begin to think differently about the pain side of this problem.
January 8th, 2006 at 12:09 am
Yes, but 80 pounds for a chance to keep your daughter as beautiful as nature intended, it’s gotta be possible. Try it befor she has a reduction.
And how can this Marc be Chloe’s fiancé, she’s only 16. And what kind of candidate for your gorgeous daughter is he if he can’t afford to buy her a custom made bra (that might keep his wife as sexy as she is now)?
January 8th, 2006 at 12:25 am
And Marc, what kind of damage is that precisely and what comments are you ashamed about?
Really. To be Chloe Rogers (16 years old!) fiancé AND not being able to buy her something so important for only 80 pounds. It’s just too absurd.
(I don’t want to trivialize poverty)
January 8th, 2006 at 12:47 am
I had a good laugh at some of the comments on here, you can not be serious about your last comments Jorey, I’m not….. check my ip address.
By the way good luck Marc and Chloe….hes a lucky guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
January 8th, 2006 at 12:47 am
How old are you Marc?
January 8th, 2006 at 12:48 am
To smart to fall for your hook line and sinker lolol
January 8th, 2006 at 1:02 am
I think this blog has run its course on this subject, give the girls a break and let them enjoy 2 minutes of fame.
Good luck to them all
January 8th, 2006 at 1:07 am
You say “hes a lucky guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!” because he has a girl with such big boobs. But they will be reduced in the future so calling him a “luck guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” doesn’t make a lot of sense, does it?
January 8th, 2006 at 1:42 am
joery: you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. my bra is the right size for me but it no way eleviates the discomfort and pain from my boobs.
Marc is a lucky guy cause chloe is a great person being with someone just cause they have big boobs does not make anyone a lucky guy it makes them very shallow and a jerk.Just like you sound.
Why cant chloe have a fiance at 16 and why should he chloe or her mum have to spend all that money on a bra when it wont make much difference. Bras may well hold breats but to hold them the weight is on the shoulders, and strains the neck back etc so having a well fitted bra still wont eliviate the pain.
January 8th, 2006 at 2:25 am
Look Natasha, my reacting to Outlookman was just to point out the illogicality of his statement. If you’re saying that I back that statement (guy is lucky ’cause girl has big tits), that’s not true.
Furthermore I wasn’t trying to change YOUR mind about having the reduction. Just because YOU still have back problems DESPITE a well fitting bra doesn’t mean that also goes for Chloe, who is another person with another body. She until now never seems to have had a proper bra. I think the least she can do is for once get a proper bra (save up for it) and see if it works before she has her breasts reduced.
And about the intruding questions for Marc and Chloe’s mother, sorry, sorry.
I just thought that deciding to marry at age 16 is something of 2 centuries ago or for 3rd world countries but I guess it’s a free world. It’s very romantic Chloe found the love of her life and I wish both of you all the best.
I will now follow Expressman’s advice.
January 8th, 2006 at 2:41 am
Ok but just because she has a well fitting bra does not mean it will take away the pain believe me, no matter what size you are a bra is still the same, the straps take all the weight and when you have heavy breast like me and chloe all the weight of the breasts are on the shoulders, so even if it fits well over her breats it will still cut in her shoulders theres no avoiding that. The only way to stop them being heavy is to have them reduced. its also not just when we have bras on its also very painful when you take the bra off, the weight of them pulls on the shoulders pulls the skin above the breasts which is very painful, i also am hunched over when i sit, and you may well say wel just sort your posture out, ive tried sitting up straight and it also hurts my shoulders. i dont just talk for myself i think i talk for quite a few women out there.
i would like to see men even for one day carry the weight around we do on there chests they`d soon respect us for what we go through then oggling them thinking there just pretty things for you to admire.
(im not getting at anyone directly)
January 8th, 2006 at 3:02 am
Sorry Expressman, one more time.
Natasha. Do you know Milena Velba. (www.milenavelba.com) She is just like you and Chloe and at age 35 seems to be perfectly happy with her natural boobs, obviously you not and POSSIBLY Chloe neither.
Goodbuy.
January 8th, 2006 at 3:49 am
Natasha, Chloe, Leanne and Rachel, you’re all beautiful lasses that have had to suffer in one form or another because of your breast size.
I personally think you all look great and you all come across like decent and intelligent lasses, and I hope whatever course of action you take regarding your breasts is the right one and it makes your struggle somewhat easier.
Maybe it’s time to put this discussion to bed, so i wish you all well and hope that the comments on here were a fair represantiation of who you really are (by that I mean I don’t believe the person claiming to be Rachel Aldana was really her but the rest of you seem very genuine).
January 8th, 2006 at 2:10 pm
Oh dear Oh dear
I thought this was an intelligent conversation, how wrong could I be.
Joery said in a previous post that ….. [Edited out by Moderator]
Just who do you think you are to make judgements like this on people you have never met.
My daughter is beautiful and intelligent and I am very proud of her. I do not have to justify myself or her to idiots like you.
January 8th, 2006 at 2:53 pm
some people just have no live do they? and yes i posted a real comment but to you this all just seems a joke.
January 8th, 2006 at 2:55 pm
Julie they are throwing you a hook, don’t get caught up with these comments. S.W.
January 8th, 2006 at 3:42 pm
I respect Chloe’s decision. I just think it’s ashame that she will go through with the reduction as her breasts are beautiful, as is she. I can understand how annoying it must be for her and it’s her decision. I just wish her the best. It is so sad as I think she has a gorgeous chest that she could make a lot of money from.
January 8th, 2006 at 4:06 pm
The only one who’s throwing hooks is you Outlook, it’s so sad, you’re truly what I just called you. I díd believe Julie’s post was real and Natasha’s too and I damn you for posting that fake post by “Marc” that temporarely made me lose my mind. For what it’s worth, Julie, I was indeed wrong for judging you and your daughter without knowing you two and I wish you would have dismissed Outlooks TRAP befor I was foolish enough to step in it (I don’t know what your game is Outlook, but apart from your posts and the “spiteful Rachel post” all the other posts might all be genuine to me, who is “they” man, apart from you?) The notion that indeed beautiful and lovely Chloe was engaged to this Marc filled me with blind rage, of which I’m terribly ashamed.
I’m a great admirer of Blackadder, Bottom, Beatles, the Police, Pink Floyd, English humour in general, really loved HBO’s and BBC’s Rome,etc.
January 8th, 2006 at 4:28 pm
NO TRAP- YES YOU ARE LOSING YOUR MIND!
The notion that indeed beautiful and lovely Chloe was engaged to this Marc filled me with blind rage, of which I’m terribly ashamed. YOUR WORDS
Your comments enraged me about Marc as you spouted contempt.
You don’t live in the real world and you judge people by your standards thus i wanted to expose how this site can be manipulated by false postings.
It does not matter if Marc exsists or not, but Marcs posting exposed your pathetic attitude and enraged me as his father.
ps Marcs Father …….Yes I am real .
January 8th, 2006 at 6:55 pm
I Quote
Joery Says:
January 5th, 2006 at 4:37 pm
I hereby call on everybody to participate in freezing this most interesting thread and collectively insist on the Administrator(s) to create a User Registration Forum (if there is a proper web-term or abbreviation for “user registration forum”, please enlighten me) so we can continue this open discussion on a much more reliable basis. (I realize there are downsides to this system, such as the possibility of elitism, but I’m ok with that).
Or at least elaborate on it.
Administrator, if you have deliberately avoided this kind of a posting system, please tell us what you think of it anyway.
I’m saying this because I think we have reached a dead end, where someone will only occasionally shout: “please Chloe, don’t have the reduction!” (which I’m pretty gutted about) and “I like Rachel more” and possible topheavy women won’t bother to join in with the discussion because people will constantly wonder if it’s really them.
January 8th, 2006 at 11:25 pm
Guys, just admire the amazing boobs on show here. Chloe is simply stunning, no question. If she chose to, she could be bigger than Linsey Dawn Mckenzie. Rachael and Natasha are also hot. Lets not get abusive about it. In short, I wish Chloe all the best but I also wish she would reconsider the reduction. At least put it back a year or two and do some glamour modelling or go on Trisha so all us big natural boob lovers can admire you. You are a stunning girl with boobs to die for. Boobs as unique as your deserve to be shown.
January 9th, 2006 at 3:15 am
“Joery” (not the real one, mind) said:
The postings on this web blog are all made under FALSE IDENTITIES just to keep the flow. Don’t be sucked in!
Jorey get a real message board, not this pile of crap when anyone can write and post rubbish under several names. check my ip addresses.
I have posted to prove a point under the names
Marc
Outlookman
Expressman
Joery
The site owner or moderator hould have a better control on the content posted.
PS. If any of the people posted a real comment ……..sorry
Dear Expressman, Joery Says, Me, Myself & I, Moderator, Outlook among many, Outlookman, JOERY (not the real one), REESE (also, also wik)~
Your feeble apology is not accepted…especially in the light of your subsequent, piss-taking posts. I come back from a pleasant weekend away to this. You should be utterly ashamed of yourself, ruining a reasonable exchange of ideas between individuals who feel strongly about a topic. Your IP address - 62.3.106.25 (for those “in the know”, who can track it to a physical street address) - has been banned from this site. So far in this discussion, you have been the only one to attempt impersonating other visitors in your comments by issuing such from the same location. I apologise to those genuine people who have posted heartfelt comments here and have seriously considered closing down the comments section due to this gross impropriety. HOWEVER, there’s no reason why I should penalize all of MyBoobSite’s visitors for the ignorance of one. Thus, I shall merely have to redouble my efforts to ensure that this does not occur in the future. You have abused the liberties afforded to you upon this open forum, and I shall not tolerate this any longer. And here I am naively thinking that the concept of “freedom of speech” is a good thing…
Cheers,
~Reese
P.S. to “62.3.106.25″: …if you take issue with this, please e-mail me personally (as your IP address has been banned from this site).
P.P.S. also to “62.3.106.25″: As an American transplanted to England, I am greatly saddened that a “fellow Brit” would stoop to such deviance.
P.P.P.S. to the real Joery: As much as I respect the good people of The Netherlands, be careful of what you say about Brits and Americans. ;~)
P.P.P.P.S. to Sean: I couldn’t concur more.
P.P.P.P.P.S. to Chloe’s mum: I am deeply sorry for what has occurred here, and I do appreciate your genuine efforts to “set the record straight” on so many levels. You deserve the utmost respect for coming forward with your thoughts and insights…if only someone hadn’t come along and ruined it for everyone. :~(
January 9th, 2006 at 5:00 pm
Julie~
No, thank you for your understanding.
To All~
Because of the issues raised in this post, I have restructured the discussion section a bit to require that all new comments be approved prior to appearing here. A name and e-mail address is also required to post from now on. It’s sad that things have disintegrated into petty abuse, and I must say that this particular entry is wholly responsible for that (check the replies to some of my other posts to see what I mean).
As for the reason I’ve not made MyBoobSite a registration-only forum: First off, it’s not a forum at all, it’s my personal weblog in which I share whatever big boobs I might come across whilst surfing the ‘net. I merely opened a “comments” section to allow others to express their opinions about what I post. Secondly, I used to believe in free speech…that is until I encountered the unfortunate ‘net subculture who saw fit to abuse my trust.
Honestly, I spend enough time seeking out and editing new material, not to mention communicating with webmasters and models, in order to provide quality photo and video content for the genuine fans of this site. I have neither the resources nor the inclination to run a full-blown “message board” as well. However, because of recent events, I find that I’ll at least have to moderate every single post that visitors make on this site, and this will be at the expense of those who come here for MyBoobSite’s intended purpose: the admiration of and respect for large breasts (so my humblest apologies to them as well).
That said, there’s a secondary purpose to this site as well: That is to help promote the appreciation of women of all shapes and sizes - provided they’ve got a lot up top, of course ;~) - something I’d mentioned in my “Virtue of Selfishness” post shortly after I’d first begun blogging. I had hoped to encourage the same through this post, but, to my dismay and disillusionment, the discussions quickly degenerated.
A big THANK YOU to those visitors who have been respectful in their posts here, to the four stunning girls who’ve shared both their beauty and a moment of their lives with us, and to all of MyBoobSite’s regulars who make my continued efforts worthwhile.
Sincerely,
~Reese! :~)
January 9th, 2006 at 5:19 pm
Nice one Reese, good idea. This thread was actually quite interesting until the joker started to ruin things.
The saddest part is Chloes mother, leanne and Natasha have taken the time to visit and contribute but yet were exposed to the rantings of one sad individual.
Now as much as guys like us admire big chested women, they have also pointed out how much they have suffered as a result of their breast size. Its just a shame that they had to see more of that kind of attitude on here by people pretending to be Chloes fiancee etc.
I just want to assure these ladies that not all guys are complete shallow idiots, and there are some people who can appreciate a persons natural beaty on the inside, because as beautiful as the four girls are, there’s so much more to a human being than big tits.
January 9th, 2006 at 5:44 pm
Dear Reese
Thank you for at least changing your system posting although you did not have the guts to leave my final reply on the board.
You should have at least explained why and moderated all the other suspect postings.
The irony is that my intentions were honourably trying to protect my son and his girlfriend Chloe, from the type of insults displayed.
People need to protect their identity when posting and not cloned as on your board.
I have no hard feelings to you and you work hard on your site.
Westy
PS and yes my last contact to you
January 9th, 2006 at 6:00 pm
Dear Westy~
No, I did not post your previous reply to the board, as I found it to be abusive. I do intend to weed through the responses to this thread so far, whenever I can find the time, and delete those which are found to be either objectionable or disrespectful. I do, however, appreciate your position in trying to protect your son and his girlfriend from any untoward remarks made here.
That said, the only way that I could genuinely verify a given poster’s true identity, even in a registration-based forum, would be to either go through credit card verification (as they use on the iFriends adult webcam site) or require a full photo ID documentation package (not unlike the U.S.C. Title 18, Section 2257 data that must be maintained on every professional model who appears here)…and that’s simply not feasible.
Thus, I must still leave it up to each and every visitor to discern for themselves the integrity of the comments they read.
All the best to you and your family…
~Reese! :~)
January 9th, 2006 at 11:04 pm
I just want to see Chloe’s amazing puppies. She should join Score or something!
January 11th, 2006 at 3:40 pm
wow ,i love you.you know it mmm baby
January 12th, 2006 at 11:43 pm
More Chloe, more Chloe!!!
January 13th, 2006 at 2:22 am
I think we should try to discuss ways to be more constructive and help these girl’s situations.
This thread should be aimed at Bra Manufacturers to improve Brasier design and leave potential surgery, which carries risks, as a last resort. Perhaps bra straps could be wider and cover more of the shoulder, and the back straps more substantial, spread the pressure around the torso and shoulder more than those skinny bra straps, or perhaps use of new fabrics.
The ladies may say that these may not be as pretty as more ‘conventional’ bras but I disagree. As an admirer of very large breasted women I would like to think women would be proud of being well-endowed, and be proud to wear one.
I do sympathise with these girls, but I would hope that bra manufacurers would take note and try to help avoid drastic surgery when a much simpler and less risky alternative were available like a new design of lingerie. Theres a challenge to you Bra manufacturers! Would it be better if the ladies wore 2 bras until someone comes out with something better?
I must say one thing that saddens me was something that natasha said:
Natasha, as admirers we DO, and I think I speak for most of us, respect you lovely ladies, and we sympathise with the practical problems of having such large and heavy breasts. But when you said ‘they’re not just pretty things for you to admire’ , I guess I just wanted to say that it is a sad day if men are made to feel guilty for admiring such a beautiful and feminine part of the female body, I dont mean ogling and leering or making lewd comments, I mean admiring discreetly.
I hope that these young ladies dont get breast reductions, I think they are goddesses and are beautiful just the way they are, and perhaps you should consider strongly ALL other alternatives, perhaps back excersises, swimming for example, will strengthen the back and the pectoral muscles which may help provide more support, together with buying a few good bras to avoid surgery has got to be worth a try?? But whatever decisions you make I wish you all the best.
January 16th, 2006 at 4:18 pm
I still want to see Chloe’s wonderful pppies!!
February 19th, 2006 at 1:36 pm
Hi,
Has anyone thought of actuaqlly doing something constructive? What about offering to buy Chloe a decent bra? Or offering a modelling assignment / photoshoot to this gorgeous girl?
My ex had a breast reduction because of bitchiness from other people and nearly died when the surgeon made a mistake and cut a major blood vessel. I would be prepared to offer the price of a decent bra if this is all it takes to stop Chloe doing something she might regret later.
I realise this may not be a long term alternative to surgery, but as all surgery is potentially dangerous, surely it’s worth considering?
Lee
February 21st, 2006 at 7:18 pm
i aqm a friend of rachels.. rachel didnt evan know about this site untill recently, she is very down to earth a really nice person over all really nice, she would never say anything bad about these girls - she`s in the same situation as them. rachel doesnt like her boobs at all but she deals with what she is given and to be honest these big assetts make her who she is and myself and eveyone of her friends and who else knows her - loves her so much because of them
February 22nd, 2006 at 10:46 pm
Chloe shouldn’t get a breast reduction. Those natural wonders of hers are spectacular and should not be tampered with. Chloe, you are stunning with a great figure!! Please get in touch with us.
February 28th, 2006 at 12:17 pm
I agree with Lee, in his post of 2/19/06. If I could send Rachel and the other girls featured in the People article a nice solid bra and vouchers to get them proper bra fittings, I definitely would. I think it would be a nice gesture if we here could pool some money together and do that for these ladies whose figures we so admire and wish to preserve. It would not be charity, it would be equivalent to doing something nice for someone who deserves it, and as far as I am concerned, these gals deserve all the breaks they could get.
March 7th, 2006 at 12:50 am
chloes breasts are huge.All i want to know is are they bigger than Linsey Dawn Mckenzie’s
March 8th, 2006 at 10:28 pm
I would love to know the same. I think we should start a petition to make Chloe a star! With a chest like that, she could go far!!